翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Jonet-Pastré
・ Jonetani Galuinadi
・ Jonetani Kaukimoce
・ Jonetani Ralulu
・ Jonetani Ratu
・ Jonette Engan
・ Joneydabad
・ Jonezen
・ Jones Township, Elk County, Pennsylvania
・ Jones Tract
・ Jones v Kaney
・ Jones v Kernott
・ Jones v Lipman
・ Jones v Lock
・ Jones v New Brunswick (AG)
Jones v Padavatton
・ Jones v Post Office
・ Jones v University of Manchester
・ Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
・ Jones v. Bock
・ Jones v. City of Opelika (1942)
・ Jones v. Cunningham
・ Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment Recordings LLC
・ Jones v. Flowers
・ Jones v. Harris Associates
・ Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union
・ Jones v. Racetrac Petroleum Inc.
・ Jones v. United States
・ Jones v. United States (1983)
・ Jones v. United States (1999)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Jones v Padavatton : ウィキペディア英語版
Jones v Padavatton

''Jones v Padavatton'' () (EWCA Civ 4 ) is a leading English decision on contract law. The decision demonstrates how domestic agreements, such as in between a mother and daughter, are presumed not to be legally binding unless there is clear intention.
==Facts==
A mother, Mrs Violet Lalgee Jones, agreed with her daughter, Mrs Ruby Padavatton, that if she would give up her secretary job at the Indian embassy in Washington DC and study for the bar in England, the mother would pay maintenance (from Trinidad, East Indian descent). The mother gave monthly payments of 42 pounds and then bought a London house (moving out of a one room flat in Acton to 181 Highbury Quadrant, Highbury) which she lived in and rented out. Then they had a quarrel while Mrs Padavatton was still completing her bar exams at Lincoln's Inn. The mother brought an action for possession of the house. The daughter argued there was a binding contract that she could stay.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Jones v Padavatton」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.